Ongoing brouhaha over Alameda non-rescue

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
The news story about Alameda firefighters and police who did nothing while a man drowned to death continues to make waves in northern California. I was on the radio today and my column from the weekend looked more deeply at the issue. Virtually all of the emails I have received from self-described firefighters and police have been supportive of how the Alameda "first responders" handled the situation, although a handful were appalled by the comments of the chief who admitted that he would rather let a child drown than violate department policy against cold-water rescues.
This is from a typical email:

"I don't really know how many people swallowed your self-righteous BS about the police and fire 'do-nothings,' but I think you should first look at the elected officials who decided water-rescue training on an island was no longer necessary.

"Though I was not there, and neither were you, I cannot say whether or not this individual had a weapon, or what his reaction may have been to a group of officials coming to 'get' him. The first thing you, the lawyers, and every other instant expert would say is: were they acting within established policy? Were they acting within their scope of training?

"In your life, making an assumption will at best make you look like more of a horse's rear than you already do. In the case of a public safety official, that assumption could get them killed. ... Rules are in place for a reason. Do you always agree with them? No. Act outside the rules and you might not live to go home to your family after work."

This is the mentality of the bureaucrat, and it's widespread within public-safety bureaucracies, who increasingly place 'officer safety' as the main concern of any operation -- to the point that they often do nothing. As I wrote in my column,

"Police and fire agencies are bureaucracies and, as such, they end up functioning in a similar manner to the Department of Motor Vehicles, the IRS and any other alphabet-soup agency you can name. As author and economist Thomas Sowell put it, 'You will never understand bureaucracies until you understand that for bureaucrats procedure is everything and outcomes are nothing.' And so normal people stand around wondering how we can end up with such a bad outcome - a preventable death - while the bureaucracies, stuck as they are on procedure, tell us they acted appropriately."

The problem is that police and fire policies are established by the unions and the politicians who curry favor with them. The key question is how to get the public interest back into the debate as we determine policies that can have life-and-death consequences.





No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.publicsectorinc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/245

Join the conversation

Related Entries:

Center for State and Local Leadership

PublicSectorInc.org is a project of the Manhattan Institute's Center for State & Local Leadership.
Copyright © 2013 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494