N.J. Taxpayers Need Every Bit of Expected Pension Savings, And More

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
New Jersey's recently-enacted public employee pension reform package, despite its shortcomings, has been called a national model. This week, it has already provided two lessons for policymakers in other states: even phased-in reforms have immediate benefits, and skipping payments creates problems more complicated than higher contributions in the future.
The good news is that New Jersey's state and local governments expect to save a combined $65 million this year as a result of the pension reforms. That relieves some pressure on taxpayers and governments in an ongoing budget crunch. The state government will need to squeeze every bit of savings possible headed into future budgets, even if the economy experiences decent growth.


After simultaneously skipping payments entirely while increasing benefits for the better part of a decade, the state has obligated itself to contribute one-seventh of the full payment this year. The contribution increases by one-seventh each year, until the state fully funds the pension program in FY' 19. The state, which saved $22 million under the phased-in reforms this year, will now pay $484 million into the fund as part of its $29.7 billion FY'12 budget.

The savings will grow over time, but so will the contribution requirements. That is the other lesson for legislatures across the nation: skipped payments and false promises create more than a mathematical problem. By skipping payments, legislators and governors not only created a higher contribution for future taxpayers, but wreaked havoc on the budget process. A $3 billion contribution is significant under any circumstances, but it becomes politically impossible when it is effectively a "new" spending item, crowding out other budget priorities. This is why the "one-seventh compromise" was necessary as the state lurches toward full payment.

A New Jersey Press Media analysis found if state tax revenues grow by 3 percent annually, increased pension contributions and transportation funding alone would consume virtually every dime of new money, forcing pensions to consume a larger and larger share of the state budge.

So, while the bi-partisan reforms passed last month may be a national model of how to begin to address a crisis, future New Jersey budgets will still remind national observers how bad behavior creates one in the first place.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.publicsectorinc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/340

Join the conversation

Related Entries:

Center for State and Local Leadership

PublicSectorInc.org is a project of the Manhattan Institute's Center for State & Local Leadership.
Copyright © 2013 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494