In today's Politico, E.J. McMahon and I expand on our recent blog items about what the market's decline is doing to public pension fund assets. We focus on California and New York, though reports are filtering out around the country of funds giving back some or even most of their recent gains. Earlier in the week the Associated Press reported that Florida's pension funds have lost some 7 percent of their value just since June 30. Rhode Island's investment portfolio, consisting mostly of pension assets, declined by 3 percent in just one day when the market tanked on Aug. 8th, and the fund has been on a rollercoaster ride since then. The state's investment assets, which peaked at $8.4 billion in 2008, are about $6.5 billion now. And so it goes with other states, too.
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://www.publicsectorinc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/423
2 Comments
Join the conversation
Related Entries:
- LA voters reject tax increase designed to save police jobs
- LA stares over pension cliff, glimpses insolvency
- Is Illinois a bigger default risk than Iraq?
- Sacramento takes stock of its debt in sobering report
- Legislators at the pension trough, part 2
- California's 'wall of debt' towers over tax revenues
- Are Illinois pensions protected by its constitution?
- The cost of pension neglect: NJ edition
- 2 scary charts about state, local debt
- Despite Clinton & Liu, infrastructure still needs saving
- San Bernardino aims to save $61 million
- Puerto Rico: The first pension domino?
- Los Angeles Pension Reform Effort Withers on the Vine
- Pension costs squeeze PA. budget
- Pensions and the Pentagon
Taxpayers have been hoodwinked LONG ENOUGH. It's WAY PAST time to END these overstuffed Public Sector Pensions. Read on to understand the extent of this taxpayers ripoff .. with the employees themselves RARELY paying for more than 10-20% of their RICH RICH pensions:
So let’s cut to the chase …....
Private sector employers typically contribute 3%-8% of an employee’s cash pay towards retirement, yet the total cost (expressed as a level annual % of cash pay throughout one’s career) of Public Sector Defined Benefit pensions (for a 30-year employee retiring at age 55) ranges from 29% to 58% depending on the richness of the benefit formula (with safety workers generally at the highest end).
More specifically, for the noted formulas, the level annual %s of cash pay are as follows:
2% per year of service w/o COLA – 29%
2% per year of service with COLA – 39%
3% per year of service w/o COLA – 44%
3% per year of service with COLA – 58%
Even after deducting the typical employee contribution of about 5% of pay, that still leaves the employer (meaning TAXPAYERS) contributing 24% to 53% of pay. The middle of these %s is 38.5% vs 5.5% (the middle of the range of what Private Sector employers contribute) or SEVEN (yes SEVEN) times greater.
This is completely absurd, and the very modest “tweaking” at the edges by practically begging employees for a few more percent of pay contributions will NOT even begin solve the HUGE financial problem.
TOTAL COMPENSATION (Cash Pay plus Pensions plus Benefits) should be comparable in the Public and Private Sectors for similar jobs, and with Cash Pay in the Public Sector now AT LEAST equal to (if not greater) than that in the Private Sector, there is ZERO justification for greater Public Sector Pensions and Benefits .
Not for PAST service, but for FUTURE service, Public Sector pension accruals must immediately be brought FULLY down to the level of their Private Sector counterparts. Due to the huge reduction needed, the ONLY way to do this is to freeze the current defined benefit plans for CURRENT (yes CURRENT) workers, and switch everyone into a 401K-style Defined Contribution Plan with an employer contribution in the same 3%-8% range granted Private Sector workers.
Additionally, since Private Sector retirees rarely get any retiree healthcare subsidy before eligibility for Medicare at age 65, similar restrictions should apply to Public Sector retirees.
It’s TAXPAYERS’ money and Civil Servants are NOT more worthy of bigger pensions and better benefits.
Taxpayers have been hoodwinked LONG ENOUGH. It's WAY PAST time to END these overstuffed Public Sector Pensions. Read on to understand the extent of this taxpayer ripoff .. with the employees themselves RARELY paying for more than 10-20% of their RICH RICH pensions:
So let’s cut to the chase …....
Private sector employers typically contribute 3%-8% of an employee’s cash pay towards retirement, yet the total cost (expressed as a level annual % of cash pay throughout one’s career) of Public Sector Defined Benefit pensions (for a 30-year employee retiring at age 55) ranges from 29% to 58% depending on the richness of the benefit formula (with safety workers generally at the highest end).
More specifically, for the noted formulas, the level annual %s of cash pay are as follows:
2% per year of service w/o COLA – 29%
2% per year of service with COLA – 39%
3% per year of service w/o COLA – 44%
3% per year of service with COLA – 58%
Even after deducting the typical employee contribution of about 5% of pay, that still leaves the employer (meaning TAXPAYERS) contributing 24% to 53% of pay. The middle of these %s is 38.5% vs 5.5% (the middle of the range of what Private Sector employers contribute) or SEVEN (yes SEVEN) times greater.
This is completely absurd, and the very modest “tweaking” at the edges by practically begging employees for a few more percent of pay contributions will NOT even begin solve the HUGE financial problem.
TOTAL COMPENSATION (Cash Pay plus Pensions plus Benefits) should be comparable in the Public and Private Sectors for similar jobs, and with Cash Pay in the Public Sector now AT LEAST equal to (if not greater) than that in the Private Sector, there is ZERO justification for greater Public Sector Pensions and Benefits .
Not for PAST service, but for FUTURE service, Public Sector pension accruals must immediately be brought FULLY down to the level of their Private Sector counterparts. Due to the huge reduction needed, the ONLY way to do this is to freeze the current defined benefit plans for CURRENT (yes CURRENT) workers, and switch everyone into a 401K-style Defined Contribution Plan with an employer contribution in the same 3%-8% range granted Private Sector workers.
Additionally, since Private Sector retirees rarely get any retiree healthcare subsidy before eligibility for Medicare at age 65, similar restrictions should apply to Public Sector retirees.
It’s TAXPAYERS’ money and Civil Servants are NOT more worthy of bigger pensions and better benefits.