There's probably nothing California legislators could do to shock anyone at this point, but Assemblyman Tom Ammiano's AB 889 is pretty crazy even by our standards. The union-sponsored bill would: "regulate the wages, hours, and working conditions of domestic work
employees, provide a private right of action for domestic work
employees, including liquidated damages, and would provide an overtime
compensation rate for domestic work employees." The legislation is apparently still alive as the session winds to a halt. If this isn't an argument for a part-time Legislature, I don't know what is. As my colleague John Seiler wrote, "It would force you to follow complex state regulations every time you
hired domestic help, including a babysitter. Absurdly, your babysitter
would have to get a break every two hours. From what, writing on
Facebook while your kids are asleep?" Past legislation unionized in-home health workers -- i.e., relatives who receive payments from the state to take care of their own sick relatives. Maybe your babysitter will soon be seen on the Capitol steps saying, "!Si, se puede!"
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://www.publicsectorinc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/456
Related Entries:
- Question for next mayor: Bloomberg or Faulkner?
- Shining a light on release time
- Providence's fate may rest in courts
- Unions prioritize themselves over services for the sick and poor
- Public employee unions and borrowing costs
- Get your boxing gloves out!
- One place where Public Sector Inc. is shrinking
- Is the pension-reform argument over now?
- Union dues no bargain, even to union official
- Even in wake of sexual abuse scandal, California teachers union fighting accountability measures
- 2012: Year of the urban fiscal crisis
- LA's harsh budget reality includes fear of bankruptcy
- The unintended use of the recall in Wisconsin
- Stockton: How politicians betray the public trust
- Cleveland school reform plan not a "War on Public Education"

Join the conversation