Hypocrisy, thy name is CSEA

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
danny_donohue_edit--300x300.jpgToday's New York Daily News has a strong editorial condemning the "breathtaking hypocrisy" of New York state government's biggest union, which is now complaining about a retirement "perk" that the union blocked for its own members.

When Governor Cuomo proposed giving future employees the option of choosing a defined-contribution retirement plan, the 66,000-member Civil Service Employees Association (CSEA) and its allies angrily rejected the idea, calling DC plans part of an "assault on the middle class" and a threat to retirement security of workers. To be sure, Cuomo's proposal was poorly conceived and inadequately funded.  But instead of lobbying for a better DC plan, like the one already chosen by three quarters of the professors at the State University of New York (SUNY) and City University of New York (CUNY), CSEA President Danny Donohue and other union bosses loudly, persistently and categorically rejected any kind of personal retirement account option.
Cuomo retreated, and the final Tier 6 pension bill included a DC plan option only for non-union employees earning over $75,000 a year. However, the final version was much better than the governor's original, since it was modeled directly on the SUNY plans, including an 8 percent employer contribution.  And so CSEA is now angrily denouncing the limited DC plan on the grounds that it is an overly generous "boondoggle." 

The News nails this one cleanly:

Remember that 401(k)-style retirement option the public employee unions hated so much? The one they portrayed as an assault on the middle class? The one they predicted would doom government workers to poverty in old age? The one they succeeded in blocking for their entire membership?

Well -- now that Gov. Cuomo's pension overhaul is law -- that same benefit is all of a sudden a "perk" and a "really big cash bonus."

Those who qualify get "an extra 8% of salary each year," the Civil Service Employees Association screams in a new TV ad. "And in just one year, they can take the money and run."

CSEA wants the audience to think this is some kind of scandal, because the "perk" is available only to nonunion employees who make $75,000 or more.

What the ad doesn't mention is that Cuomo tried to give that same choice to all workers -- on a purely voluntary basis -- and CSEA and the other unions turned him down flat.

CSEA President Danny Donohue and fellow labor bosses decided future workers should have defined-benefit pensions or nothing.

Kowtowing lawmakers gave them their wish.

And now they complain that political appointees are getting special treatment?

The hypocrisy is breathtaking.

Union members should watch the ad and know that 401(k)-style retirement accounts can be a sweet deal -- especially for employees who spend less than a full career on the public payroll.

They should also know that the ones shafting them out of this nice benefit were none other than their own union leadership.

We're still waiting for someone to ask Donohue what he's got against unionized SUNY and CUNY professors.

By the way, as this article notes, Donohue is now running for the national presidency of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.publicsectorinc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/778

Join the conversation

Related Entries:

Center for State and Local Leadership

PublicSectorInc.org is a project of the Manhattan Institute's Center for State & Local Leadership.
Copyright © 2013 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494