New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has been perhaps the chief advocate for Keynesian style economic stimulus from government throughout this long downturn. While he's focused much of his attention on federal spending, he's also taken on cuts in state and local government, arguing that the layoffs of cops, teachers and firefighters have prolonged the recession. He's advocated for more aid from Washington. In today's column, for instance, he compares government hiring and spending during the recovery of Ronald Reagan's first term, in which payrolls were growing, to today's situation, with a shrinking government workforce. But Krugman's analysis is short on context.
What he ignores in particular is that state and local governments have been on a hiring spree since the Reagan years and that employee head count and expenditures, especially for items like pensions and health benefits, have soared relative to the growth of the population that government serves. One result is that local government in America was headed for an inevitable retrenchment and that federal stimulus, like the $200 billion that Washington sent states' way in 2009, only put off the day of reckoning.
Krugman says that if local government were growing at the rate of the Reagan recovery we'd have some 1.3 million more "schoolteachers, firefighters, police officers, etc." To Krugman it seems inconsequential whether we need those additional 1.3 million government workers.
In education, for instance, our public schools have been hiring robustly for years, and we've doubled education spending in real terms since the Reagan recovery. In 1980, our schools employed 1 teacher per 18.7 students, and today they employ 1 per 15.5 students. Schools have hired non-instructional support personnel at an even faster rate, going from 1 worker per 15 students in 1980 to 1 per 10 today.
School budgets have soared as a result, placing an increasing burden on taxpayers. In 1980 we spent $6024 per pupil (in current dollars) on public education; today we are spending $10,667, a substantial gain in real spending.
Cops are another area were localities have bulked up. Starting in the late 1980s and early 1990s police departments accelerated hiring in response to rising crime. From 1992 through 2008, according to the Department of Justice's Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, law-enforcement hiring soared by one-third, to more than 1.1 million. That outpaced the country's population increase in the period so that the ratio of law-enforcement personnel relative to the general population increased by 12%.
In a report in 2010 the National Governor's Association said that states and cities faced a new fiscal reality thanks to the severity of this downturn. "Unfortunately, this downturn does not resemble a normal business-cycle recession," the group noted. Indeed, four years after the financial meltdown, state and local tax collections in some places still have not recovered to their pre-recesssion levels. Meanwhile, costs, including employee costs, have continued rising. The retrenchment many governments are now undertaking is in response to that new fiscal reality. Washington, buried in its own fiscal problems, could only do so much to help.
Krugman says that if local government were growing at the rate of the Reagan recovery we'd have some 1.3 million more "schoolteachers, firefighters, police officers, etc." To Krugman it seems inconsequential whether we need those additional 1.3 million government workers.
In education, for instance, our public schools have been hiring robustly for years, and we've doubled education spending in real terms since the Reagan recovery. In 1980, our schools employed 1 teacher per 18.7 students, and today they employ 1 per 15.5 students. Schools have hired non-instructional support personnel at an even faster rate, going from 1 worker per 15 students in 1980 to 1 per 10 today.
School budgets have soared as a result, placing an increasing burden on taxpayers. In 1980 we spent $6024 per pupil (in current dollars) on public education; today we are spending $10,667, a substantial gain in real spending.
Cops are another area were localities have bulked up. Starting in the late 1980s and early 1990s police departments accelerated hiring in response to rising crime. From 1992 through 2008, according to the Department of Justice's Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, law-enforcement hiring soared by one-third, to more than 1.1 million. That outpaced the country's population increase in the period so that the ratio of law-enforcement personnel relative to the general population increased by 12%.
Many of those gains were never meant to be permanent. New York City increased its police force during the 1990s by perhaps 15 percent as it battled crime. But as crime declined to historically low levels, the city then began after 2001 slowly shrinking its police force. Today, it's back down to about early 1990 levels.
In a report in 2010 the National Governor's Association said that states and cities faced a new fiscal reality thanks to the severity of this downturn. "Unfortunately, this downturn does not resemble a normal business-cycle recession," the group noted. Indeed, four years after the financial meltdown, state and local tax collections in some places still have not recovered to their pre-recesssion levels. Meanwhile, costs, including employee costs, have continued rising. The retrenchment many governments are now undertaking is in response to that new fiscal reality. Washington, buried in its own fiscal problems, could only do so much to help.


Excellent information. Krugman's column provoked me to look into these numbers as well. Here are some other numbers to provide context:
This increase in K-12 education spending is even more remarkable when you consider that the proportion of the population that is school-aged has gone from 20.9% to 17.3% since 1980.
Source: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_022.asp?referrer=list
And, despite this significant decrease in the proportion of schoolchildren, spending on K-12 education has increased from 4.0% to 4.6% of GDP over the same period (a 15% increase). The current level is an all-time high, matching the spending level in 1970 when the baby boom was in full effect and 25.8% of the population was school-aged.
Source: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_028.asp?referrer=list
Perhaps it is wise to spend even more money per student on K-12 education, but it also seems wise to consider whether the spending run-up since 1980 is sustainable.
Let me get this straight. Krugman is a Nobel laureate loon who is debunked on an hourly basis by internet skeptics. Yet, he has a "share of mind" that includes 92% of all NYT editorial page readers. Further debunking MUST be directed at that small?large?influential? group of upper Eastsiders who still think Nobel laureate Krugman has any credibility. Seems like a Sisyphean waste of time, to me.