My second article from the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems convention highlights a difference of opinion between private- and public-sector unions. The building trades support private infrastructure investments, but public-sector pension officials were skeptical.
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://www.publicsectorinc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/836
Related Entries:
- LA voters reject tax increase designed to save police jobs
- LA stares over pension cliff, glimpses insolvency
- Is Illinois a bigger default risk than Iraq?
- Trends and tea leaves in the BLS' annual unionization report
- Sacramento takes stock of its debt in sobering report
- Legislators at the pension trough, part 2
- California's 'wall of debt' towers over tax revenues
- Are Illinois pensions protected by its constitution?
- The cost of pension neglect: NJ edition
- 2 scary charts about state, local debt
- Despite Clinton & Liu, infrastructure still needs saving
- Why state and local government?
- San Bernardino aims to save $61 million
- Puerto Rico: The first pension domino?
- Los Angeles Pension Reform Effort Withers on the Vine
Join the conversation