Public pensions vault over IRS limits

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks
The latest government to face the challenge of paying pensions that are over the IRS limit on defined benefit plans is Sonoma County, Ca., According to a PressDemocrat.com story, about a dozen county retirees are earning more than the IRS limit, and the number is growing. For local governments, that's an expensive proposition.

Few taxpayers seem to understand that the IRS puts limits on annual pensions. For those retiring at age 65 the maximum annual benefit is $200,000 in defined benefit pension plans. For those retiring earlier, a real issue in the public sector, the limit falls lower.
But wait, you say, you've read about numerous cases of employees retiring with more, like former San Francisco police director Heather Fong, who receives a pension of about $260,000 annually, for instance. How?  A public employer can still only pay $200,000 out of its pension system; the rest comes directly from a general government budget, which is more expensive because it's a pay-as-you-go method of funding.

The PressDemocrat.com explains the growing problem in Sonoma:

Sonoma County retirees who hit the federal limits in 2011 represent the new era of higher pensions. They include five of the 10 highest-paid county retirees, including Bill Cogbill, the former sheriff, and Mike Chrystal, the former county administrator.Both get annual pensions higher than the current Internal Revenue Service cap of $200,000 for defined benefit plans. Cogbill's pension is $239,311, and Chrystal's is $209,862.

Each year, taxpayers front the money that goes to those high earners after they've hit the federal caps in the form of checks out of the county general fund. Totals have ranged from $98,000 in 2009 to $161,000 in 2011. County officials said it could rise in the future.

Without reform, the pensions of more and more public workers in generous states like California, especially the pensions of well-paid city managers and schools superintendents and police and fire directors, will leap over the IRS limits, which tend to rise slowly over time, unlike some government pensions.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.publicsectorinc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/849

2 Comments

Steve, is this the only way to deal with the IRS cap? Connecticut has this problem and just realized it recently. They are negotiating with the IRS. I guess the state could be required to reimburse the pension fund for payments above the cap, but the state could just reduce its contribution accordingly. Not sure where that leaves us...

I don't not believe it is possible to pay this additional money out of a pension fund, even if the fund is then reimbursed for it. That's because the IRS rules are designed to insure that employers don't use a pension fund as a tax shelter for unlimited deferred income for executives. Typically states have been paying this additional cash directly out of budgets (see the SF police director example in my IBD op-ed), or establishing separate funds out of which they pay these claims.

Join the conversation

Related Entries:

Center for State and Local Leadership

PublicSectorInc.org is a project of the Manhattan Institute's Center for State & Local Leadership.
Copyright © 2013 Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017
phone (212) 599-7000 / fax (212) 599-3494